Dr. Michael Tellinger SHOCKING ENLIGHTENMENT TRUE HISTORY OF EARTH and Discoveries. Wake up!

Dr. Michael Tellinger SHOCKING ENLIGHTENMENT TRUE HISTORY OF EARTH and Discoveries. Wake up

(listen and Research All Testimonies Yourself)

Lets Watch FIRST than Discussed 

Michael Tellinger

Now lets Discussed 

Sound is faster than speed of light Research

Dr. Bill Robertson doesn’t let a little thing like the speed of light limit him. Last summer, researching with two MTSU undergraduates, a high-school teacher and two high-school students, Robertson achieved results that at first seem to fly in the face of one of the most fundamental laws of physics. Using a Rube Goldberg assemblage of regular PVC pipe, a speaker and assorted instruments, the group managed to produce a pulse of sound that exceeded the speed of light. A paper describing his research, “Sound beyond the speed of light: Measurement of negative group velocity in an acoustic loop filter, “ appeared in the January 2007 issue of Applied Physics Letters. The MTSU students involved in the project were physics major Jason Pappafotis and math major Patrick Flannigan. Teacher Jan Cathey and student Brandon Cathey came from Siegel High School; Colin Klaus from Blackman High was the other high school student. Their research was part of STEPmt, a program designed to increase discovery-based learning and undergraduate research in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. After the initial article was published, Robertson’s research was highlighted in several additional scientific publications. It also generated heated discussions on the web. Some bloggers, Robertson said, referred to him in angry and unflattering terms. “People said, ‘This just can’t be right,’” he recalled, taking the criticism in stride. “This doesn’t mean you can call yourself on the phone last Wednesday. It doesn’t violate causality or special relativity. No energy or information travels faster than the speed of light.” Robertson explained that there are “two ways of measuring wave velocity: group velocity and phase velocity. What we were looking at was group velocity.” There’s no easy way to completely explain the phenomenon he has been investigating. As Robertson told his student researchers last summer, “You don’t figure this out on day one. It takes a few weeks to understand what’s going on.” This was not the first time his research has produced intriguing results. In 2002, Robertson, with the help of senior physics and astronomy major Jeremy Munday, used an oscilloscope and other basic laboratory equipment to send an electronic signal at least four times faster than the speed of light. Later that year, a report of the experiment was published in the Sept. 9 issue of Applied Physics Letters. His work is more than an abstract investigation of an odd phenomenon; Robertson’s results have important engineering applications. He cited the example of a computer chip that might send eight separate signals through circuits of different lengths. Applying methods used in his experiments, it’s possible to “manipulate the speed of signals that travel varying paths so they arrive at the same time.” The concepts may be hard to understand, but Robertson’s approach to teaching and research is something everyone, especially students, can appreciate. He enjoys learning and discovery and passes those qualities to his students. One of the things he requires of his students in addition to the traditional tests and quizzes is a special semester project. Many students choose to build a musical instrument and test its acoustics. When projects are presented in December, they reveal a cacophonous assortment of flutes, kazoos, trumpets, xylophones, stringed instruments, electrical tone generators and didgeridoos. A few years ago, one of his students made a didgeridoo for his final project. Fascinated by the acoustics of the droning instrument from the Australian outback, Robertson created a Web page discussing the special acoustics of the instrument. His site drew attention from people all over the world and he has since become somewhat of an expert on the didgeridoo. To read more about Robertson’s latest research, visit www.livescience.com/ technology/070112_ftl_sound.html. An article on his 2002 research on electrical pulses appeared in the September 30, 2002, edition of The Record. It’s available at www.mtsu.edu/~proffice/Record/Rec_v11/rec1106/rec1106.html#Speed. His Web page on the didgeridoo is at http://physics.mtsu.edu/~wmr/didj.html. On that page, one can listen to Robertson play the instrument and view its acoustic spectrum. The Record Feb. 26, 2007 page 3 F 

link to the PDF REPORT FILE

Sound is faster than speed of sound

2014 Ancient Hidden Technology of the Annunaki (Fallen Angels) Amazing !

Documentary Ancient Babylon | The Bible's Buried Secrets | History Chann...

Anonymous Documentary - How Anonymous Hackers Changed the World Full Doc...

See the Growth and inspiration and how Anonymous was sparked, as well the inner and toward growth that not only showed the ugly side of how to really effect change and also the locality and values from just one tiny ideal moral belief that internet shall and will always be freedom of speech and every person has right to say, share, and use freedom of speech. As well the lengths real people will go to protect it.. 

To everyone out there and all that are doing there parts and roles to protect moral values, Thank you all sincerely,  and MAYBE BLESSED with everlasting knowledgeable enlightenment and be blessed. 

For you all, no matter the risk and fear that stood in your way, not once backed down and stood and still fight for a righteous.. moral cause ...
so remember... when  always united  can evolution change that can never be served and shall always remain. as history taught us, Its better to die standing on my feet for my moral belief than to surrender to injustice masses forever in slaved and on my knees. So never surrender, and never give up your moral beliefs..  _Aye Sarita

HACKERS of THE SHADOWS, 2nd STRIKE SUCCESSFULLY OBTAINING ALL INFORMATION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS

HACKERS THAT LIVE IN THE SHADOWS, TAKES THERE FIRST STRIKE SUCCESSFULLY OBTAINING ALL INFORMATION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND THERE FRIENDS AND FAMILY.  

The New York Times Reports -

U.S. Hacking of Government Computers Exposed 21.5 Million People  Katherine Archuleta, director of the Office of Personnel Management, right, at hearing before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee last month. 

MARK WILSON / GETTY IMAGES
 By JULIE HIRSCHFELD DAVIS 
JULY 9, 2015 WASHINGTON — 
    The Obama administration on Thursday revealed that 21.5 million people were swept up in a colossal breach of government computer systems that was far more damaging than initially thought, resulting in the theft of a vast trove of personal information, including Social Security numbers and some fingerprints.

   Every person given a government background check for the last 15 years was probably affected, the Office of Personnel Management said in announcing the results of a forensic investigation of the episode, whose existence was known but not its sweeping toll.

     The agency said hackers stole “sensitive information,” including addresses, health and financial history, and other private details, from 19.7 million people who had been subjected to a government background check, as well as 1.8 million others, including their spouses and friends.
    The theft was separate from, but related to, a breach revealed last month that compromised the personnel data of 4.2 million federal employees, officials said.
Both attacks are believed to have originated in China, although senior administration officials on Thursday declined to pinpoint a perpetrator, except to say that they had indications that the same actor carried out the two hacks.

  The breaches constitute what is apparently the largest cyberattack into the systems of the United States government, providing a frightening glimpse of the technological vulnerabilities of federal agencies that handle sensitive information.

   They also seemed certain to intensify debate in Washington over what the government must do to address its substantial weaknesses in cybersecurity, long the subject of dire warnings but seldom acted upon by agencies, Congress or the White House.
 “This incident that we are talking about today is unfortunately not without precedent,” said Michael Daniel, the White House cybersecurity coordinator. “We have to raise our level of cybersecurity in both the private sector and the public sector.” 

  In a conference call to detail the grim findings and announce the agency’s response, Katherine Archuleta, the director of the Office of Personnel Management, said that she would not resign despite calls from members of Congress in both parties for her dismissal.

 “I am committed to the work that I am doing at O.P.M.,” she said. “We are working very hard, not only at O.P.M. but across government, to ensure the cybersecurity of all our systems, and I will continue to do so.”

  She announced new security measures that would be installed at the agency as well as free credit and identity theft monitoring for the victims of the breach, although she said there was “no information at this time to suggest any misuse or further dissemination of the information that was stolen from O.P.M.’s system.”

Even so, national security officials have acknowledged the seriousness of the intrusion. Before the scope was made public on Thursday, James B. Comey, Jr., the director of the F.B.I., called the breach “a very big deal,” noting that the information obtained included people’s addresses; details on their neighbors, friends and relatives; their travel destinations outside the United States; and any foreigners they had come into contact with.

“There is a treasure trove of information about everybody who has worked for, tried to work for or works for the United States government,” Mr. Comey said during a briefing. “Just imagine you are an intelligence service and you had that data, how it would be useful to you.”

Administration officials said it was the personnel office’s work to modernize its computer systems that first led it to detect the breach.

In April, the agency informed the Department of Homeland Security that it had found an intrusion, and the department went to work with the F.B.I. to learn more, said Andy Ozment, a top cybersecurity official at Homeland Security.

 That inquiry, he said, revealed that the intruder had broken into a network at the Interior Department that held a personnel office database, leading to the theft of records of 4.2 million current and former federal employees. It also found that there had been a computer intrusion at the personnel office itself, leading to the much larger trove of background check records.

 Mr. Ozment said the hacker in both cases gained access to the computer systems “via a compromised credential of a contractor.” The debacle has touched off a scramble by federal officials to bolster the security of their networks.

 Tony Scott, the government’s chief information officer, said every agency was racing to make improvements, including the use of basic tools like two-factor authentication that requires anyone with the password to a system to use a second, one-time password to log in from an unrecognized computer. “This is important work across all of the agencies of the federal government to make sure that we greatly enhance the cybersecurity profile of the U.S. government as a whole,” Mr. Scott said. But that effort comes after almost two decades of warnings from government auditors and other internal investigations into the vulnerabilities in federal agency networks.

“There’s still much that agencies need to do that they are not doing to protect their systems,” said Gregory C. Wilshusen, the director of information security issues at the Government Accountability Office, which has conducted cyber audits for almost two decades.

Warnings from auditors about serious vulnerabilities are often ignored by agency officials, he added. “That’s been a recurring theme. They believe they’ve taken corrective actions, but when one goes back to check, we find that they haven’t.” 

    The revelations quickly prompted calls for the ouster of Ms. Archuleta, whose agency had been warned in a series of reports since 2007 about the many vulnerabilities on its antiquated computer systems. Representative Jason Chaffetz, Republican of Utah and the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said Ms. Archuleta and her top technology official should resign or be removed.

   “Their negligence has now put the personal and sensitive information of 21.5 million Americans into the hands of our adversaries,” Mr. Chaffetz said. “Such incompetence is inexcusable.” The criticism was bipartisan. Senator Mark W. Warner, Democrat of Virginia, also called on Ms. Archuleta to step down. “The technological and security failures at the Office of Personnel Management predate this director’s term, but Director Archuleta’s slow and uneven response has not inspired confidence that she is the right person to manage OPM through this crisis,” Mr. Warner said in a statement.

That attackers were able to compromise the agency using a contractor’s credentials is unacceptable, security experts say, given the wide availability of two-factor authentication tools, which have become standard practice, particularly since a cyberattack at Target nearly two years ago, when hackers managed to break into the retailer’s system using the credentials of a heating and cooling contractor. “A second offense is more unacceptable than the first,” said Suni Munshani, the chief executive of Protegrity, a data security company.

“The O.P.M. and government agencies need to get their act together and better protect the information of their employees and citizens.” Michael D. Shear and Michael S. Schmidt contributed reporting from Washington, and Nicole Perlroth from San Francisco

.

UNTOLD HISTORY of The Life And Death Of Isabella I of Castile- OLD SPAIN

The Life And Death Of Isabella I of Castile OLD Spain 22 April 1451 -- 26 November 1504), also known as Isabella the Catholic, was queen of Castile and León (Crown of Castile)

Isabella I was born on April 22, 1451 in the town of Madrigal de las Altas Torres.  She died on November 26, 1504 in the castle of La Mota.  She is often referred to as "La Católica" (the Catholic) a "title" given to her by the Spanish Pope, Alexander VI.  This is a title that the Kings and Queens of Spain still retain.  She was the daughter of John II, King of Castile and his second wife, Isabella of Portugal. 

Her father died when she was three and her older brother became King Henry IV.  The Spanish nobles had become very powerful during the reign of John II.  They did not wish to have Henry as their king.   They felt that he was not very smart and would not be a good leader.    They hoped to make Isabella's other brother, Alfonso, their king, but he died on July 5, 1468.  Some people thought that he might have been poisoned to prevent him from being made king.  The nobles then approached Isabella who by now was 17.   She refused the throne saying that she would never become queen while her brother was alive.  Although he had a daughter, King Henry declared Isabella to be the heir to the throne when he died.  It is thought that he did this to make peace with the nobles who had wanted Isabella to be made queen.  They knew that she would be the next ruler of Spain and King Henry knew that he could continue to rule.  But soon Isabella would be at odds with her brother over her impending arranged marriage.

King Henry had wished his sister to marry Don Carlos, the Prince of Viana, who was the eldest son of John II.  He was also heir to the Kingdom of Navarre.  The King of Aragon, wished to marry Isabella to his son, Ferdinand.  Before the final arrangements could be made, Don Carlos died.  Henry tried to arrange marriages with several other people including King Alfonso V of Portugal, but Isabella had already decided that she wished to marry Ferdinand.  

Her brother was so mad that he threatened to throw her in the dungeon.  But because of her powerful supporters he knew he could not do that.  Instead he made her promise

My Family Crest passed down thru out the ages

that she would not make any plans to marry until he had returned from Andalusia.  However almost as soon as he had left, Isabella made plans to marry Ferndinand.  The only problem was that she had to find him. She sent out noblemen to search for him and he was finally found in Sicily (the island at the bottom of Italy) where he had become King.  He has also now become heir to the throne of Aragon.  He braved a trip back to Spain and married Isabella in 1469 in the palace of Juan de Vivero. King Henry was mad at his sister, but his new brother-in-law was after all the future King of Aragon.   Henry ruled for only 5 more years before he died in 1474 in Madrid.  Isabella was then declared Queen of Castile.   However, before he had died, Henry had arranged his daughter Joan to be married to King Alfonso V of Portugal.   He also made his daughter the heir to the throne. Because there was now there was uncertainty of who was the rightful Queen , Castile and Aragon went to war with Portugal.  The war last for five years and ending in peace in 1479 with an alliance between the Kingdoms.  As part of the peace treaty, Joan abandoned her claim to the throne, making Isabella Queen of Spain.   During this period, Ferdinand became King Ferdinand II of Aragon.  Isabella once again showed her great abilities when she decided that Ferdinand and herself would equally rule the two Kingdoms.  She created the motto "Tanto monta, monta tanto - Isabel como Fernando" (As much as the one is worth so much is the other - Isabella as Ferdinand).

Now that Isabella and Ferdinand were rulers they set out to achieve some goals.  One was the lessening of the power of the nobles who Isabella had thought had become too powerful.  They created an organization "Santa Hermandad" (Holy Brotherhood) which was a type of permanent military force.  It was paid for by the communities and was intended for the protection of persons and property against the violence of the nobles.  They also re-organized the courts and the administration of justice.  They removed the rights of certain people to make coins.  This made it easier for business because only one type of coin would be used.  They took away some of the lands previously given to the nobles and also destroyed some of their castles which they felt was a menace to public peace. Because they were both devoutly Catholic, they felt that they had to rid Spain of anyone who was not Catholic.  Or at least get them to convert.  For such reason they got Pope Sixtus IV to establish the Spanish Inquisition in 1478. The Spanish Inquisition, which officially lasted until 1808, was not a good period for Spain.  It was particularly bad during the reign of Isabella and Ferdinand.  Anyone who was not a Catholic was suspected of being against the church.  They risked torture and death if they did not renounce their own religion and become a Catholic.  Unfortunately even converting was not good enough for the Chief Inquisitor, Torquemada.  He convinced, Isabella and Ferdinand that the Jewish people posed a threat to their Kingdoms, even those that had previously converted.  As such on March 31, 1492 Isabella and Ferdinand ordered that by July 1st all people of the Jewish faith had to leave Spain or be put to to death.  Some of these people secretly remained in Spain, some settled in Portugal or went to North Africa.  And some decided that they would leave Spain as far behind as possible.  They decided to join with a sea captain who was looking for sailors to help him find a new western route to India.  The name of the sea captain was Christopher Columbus. Columbus had actually been asking for money to support his trip for several years.  He was Italian so he first asked for money from the rulers of the cities of Genoa and Venice in Italy. He then asked the King of Portugal. He tried Isabella and Ferdinand but they had been turning his request down because they still had one more problem they needed to handle. A portion of Spain was still under control of the Arabs (Moors).  This was the area of Granada.  By January 1, 1492, Granada was under their control.  In contrast to the way that they had treated their Jewish citizens, they treated the Moors quite well.  In the Treaty of Granada they allowed them to freely practice their religion and even be exempt from taxation for a number of years.Now that the problem of Granada was solved they began to listen to Columbus and his plans to find a new route to India.  A route not by sailing east around Africa, but rather west across unknown waters.  They also decided that it would not cost too much money to pay for the trip and the rewards might be quite grand.  The person who was in charge of the Royal Treasury said the cost of the trip (3 ships and crew) would be about what is cost them to entertain a visiting noble for one week.  On August 3, 1492 Columbus set sail with three ships the Niña, the Pinta and  the Santa Maria and 87 men.  (The flag of the main ship, the Santa Maria is shown on the left.) Columbus reached America on October 12, 1492.   Actually he had not been sailing for all that time.  He had first arrived in the Canary Islands and left them on September 6th.  He did not find a new route to India, but found for Spain a land rich with gold, silver and spices.  He was convinced that he had found a new route to Asia and the East Indies.  He thought that Cuba was actually somewhere in Asia and that the island of Hispanola (where the Dominican Republic and Haiti are now located) was just off the coast of China.  He also found the native people.  He supposedly called them Indians because he thought they were from the Indies. Columbus returned to Spain in 1493 bringing with him not only treasures, but also some of these natives.  (The picture on the left is a panel from the main door of the US Capital.  It is called the Columbus Door and has 8 panels showing scenes from Columbus' life.  Just in front of Columbus you can see two of the Native American people.)  Queen Isabella became the protector of the Native Americans.  Queen Isabella established laws against the abuse of the Native American people by colonists and adventurers. During this time Spain began its rise into greatness.  This was the beginning of the "Golden Age" of Spain.   Discovers such as Columbus were bringing them riches, their agriculture prospered, they became great manufactures of cloths, glass, steel weapons and leather goods.   This could not have been achieved without Queen Isabella.  She was able to see the potential of Columbus.  Her laws and the fair way she treated her citizens (with the exception of her horrible treatment of the Jewish citizens)  enabled Spain to be at peace internally.  Her strong army and navy made Spain a world power and a great trading power.  The Spanish she spoke is still used by the Spanish Royal Academy as the standard for the language. Isabella and Ferdinand had 5 children, four girls and 1 boy.  They were Isabella, John, Joan, Maria and Catherine.   Isabella not only made sure that the girls were well educated (which was unusual for that time), but also that they knew how to do such things as sewing.  The children actually made most of their father's clothing.  She herself would often mend her husband's and children's clothing.  Unfortunately she was not able to enjoy much happiness with her children.  Her son died in 1497.  Her daughter, Isabella became Queen of Portugal, but she died in 1498 while giving birth.  Her son (Isabella's grandson), Miguel died when he was three.  Catherine married King Henry VIII of England, but he divorced her when she was unable to produce a male heir.  Joan, who was to inherit the throne became crazy. Although she co-ruled with her husband, it was actually her that was the better ruler.  Her husband did bring to their marriage the Kingdom of Aragon which enabled them to unite Spain.   If the two Kingdoms remained separate it would have been doubtful that Spain could have achieved it greatness.  But just uniting Spain did not enable it to become this great power.  It needed a ruler such as Isabella who had the skill to guide and to make Spain a great country.  Isabella died on November 26, 1504 in Medina del Campo.  In her will she asked that her successors protect and treat the people of the Americas the same as they would the Spanish people.  Her husband continued to rule for 12 more years until he died in Madrigalejo on January 23, 1516.  He was succeeded to the throne by his grandson, who was the son of his daughter Joan.  This person was to become Holy Roman Emperor Charles V. Who knew America had a 4 dollar bills... the things we learn. pretty cool. What Lead my research to discover this untold history of Old Spain.....

Modern-day Clarification Definition of Empathy vs Sympathy

Empathy vs. Sympathy

The terms and empathy and sympathy are often confused, and with good reason. Both of the words deal with the relationship one has to the feelings and experiences of another.

Today we explore the differences between these terms and how they are most commonly used.

Both sympathy and empathy have roots in the Greek term páthos meaning “suffering, feeling.” The prefix sym- comes from the Greek sýn meaning “with, together with” and the prefix em- derives from the Greek en- meaning “within, in.”

Sympathy is the older of the two terms. It entered English in the mid-1500s with a very broad meaning of “agreement or harmony in qualities between things or people.” 

Since then, the term has come to be used in a more specific way.

Nowadays sympathy is largely used to convey commiseration, pity, or feelings of sorrow for someone who is experiencing misfortune.

This prevailing sense is epitomized in the category of greeting card most often labeled “sympathy” that specializes in messages of support and sorrow for those in a time of need.

Consider the following examples: “There was little sympathy in England for David Beckham … when he received a red card in a 1998 World Cup loss to Argentina.” –New York Times, July 2, 2015 

“…the new [Facebook] feature would automatically replace the existing ‘like’ button with a ‘sympathize’ one when users tag their statuses with a negative emotion, like ‘sad’ or ‘depressed.’” –New York, December 6, 2013

  Empathy entered English a few centuries after sympathy—in the late 1800s—with a somewhat technical and now obsolete meaning from the field of psychology, which referred to the physiological manifestation of feelings. 

  Unlike sympathy, empathy has come to be used in a more broad way than it was when it was first introduced into the lexicon; the term "empathy" is now most often used to refer to the capacity or ability to imagine oneself in the situation of another, thereby vicariously experiencing the emotions, ideas, or opinions of that person. 

  Consider the following examples: “…many of us believe that if more lives are at stake, we will — and should — feel more empathy (i.e., vicariously share others’ experiences) and do more to help.” –New York Times, July 10, 2015 

“I think that’s almost what it is sometimes if you sum up what acting is. It’s just the ultimate expression of empathy.” –Emily Blunt, Los Angeles Times, December 8, 2014

  To sum up the differences between the most commonly used meanings of these two terms:

sympathy is feeling compassion, sorrow, or pity for the hardships that another person encounters,

                 while.....

 empathy is putting yourself in the shoes of another.